We’re Killing Our Lakes and Oceans. The Consequences Are Real.

We only need to look to the Mediterranean Sea and the North American Great Lakes for dramatic illustrations of what lies in store if we don’t act now.

On January 5, 2018, a paper published in the journal Science delivered a sobering message: The oxygenation of open oceans and coastal seas has been steadily declining during the past half century. The volume of ocean with no oxygen at all has quadrupled, and the volume where oxygen levels are falling dangerously low has increased even more.

We’re seeing the same thing happen in major lakes.


The Science study reveals that the problem has taken hold in the world’s oceans already — clearly, their vastness is no safeguard.

The main culprits are warming and — especially in coastal seas and lakes — eutrophication caused by enhanced nutrient loads in runoff. The findings reaffirm that we urgently need to address global warming, and that we are in need of an updated Clean Water Act. We only need to look to the Mediterranean Sea and, more recently, the North American Great Lakes region for dramatic illustrations of what lies in store if we don’t act now.

Around 8,000 years ago, the entire eastern half of the Mediterranean Sea became severely oxygen-starved between 300 and 1,500 meters, and lost all oxygen, or became ‘anoxic,’ below that. It wasn’t warming that caused the oxygen decline then, as is happening in today’s oceans, but the amplification of the African monsoon, which drove intense flooding of the Nile River, full of nutrients from decomposing organic matter. The freshwater itself inhibited deep-water formation, while its nutrient-load led to wild-growth of algae, cyanobacteria, and animals grazing on them. Upon their death, decomposition sapped oxygen from the water, rapidly turning it oxygen-starved, anoxic, and in extreme cases rendered it ‘euxinic’ (containing hydrogen sulfide, infamous for its rotten-eggs smell).

The conditions wiped out virtually the entire ecosystem from a few hundred meters below the surface of the water to the seafloor. A devastating 4,000-year period of anoxic ‘dead zone’ conditions ensued, which all started within a century of the flooding.

Love Undark? Sign up for our newsletter!

Anoxic events are not restricted to the oceans. Dead zone conditions are now expanding rapidly throughout shallow coastal seas and lakes, critical regions for fisheries, water provision, and recreation. The problems are arising because of warming, which speeds up the oxygen-consuming microbial processes of decomposition, and because human actions are increasing nutrient input via runoff. The particularly well-studied North American Great Lakes teach us very valuable lessons.

The Great Lakes were born of a massive climate change at the end of the last ice age, some 21,000 years ago. The Earth’s orbit shifted, climate warmed, and the vast ice sheet that covered North America melted. A tremendous volume of melt-water flowed across the landscape, filled basins left by the receding ice, and created vast swampy marshes and wetlands around the lakes.

When settlers migrated along the southern shore of Lake Erie within the watersheds of the Maumee and Sandusky Rivers, they were confronted by a three-million-acre wetland: the Great Black Swamp. Thick mud and standing water surrounded clumps of giant Sycamore and Bur Oak trees. To the settlers, the trees blocked the light, while the standing water bred mosquitoes (which we now know carried malaria) and hid the farmland they needed to survive. So, the Great Black Swamp was drained, and some of the most fertile farmland in the U.S. arose.

But draining the Great Black Swamp profoundly impacted Lake Erie. The swamp was a natural filter that removed nutrients from its slow-moving streams before they could enter the lake. Cities expanded, and raw sewage was dumped into waterways, providing still more nutrients. The agricultural revolution that occurred following WWII added cheap commercial fertilizers to the mix, amplifying the problem. Lake Erie was in serious trouble.

By the 1960s and 1970s, eutrophication fuelled enormous blooms of cyanobacteria in the warm, shallow waters of Lake Erie’s Western Basin. Winds and currents drove them eastward, into the Central Basin and Cleveland’s suburban and urban sprawl. As the blooms died and sank, microbial decomposition released nutrients and consumed oxygen. It also made bottom waters more acidic, which caused a release of more nutrients back into the water from the sediments. This contributed to even larger blooms in subsequent years.

An ensuing cascade of environmental problems expanded the Central Basin anoxic dead zone, resulting in massive fish kills. Beaches were soiled with rotting cyanobacterial mats. The water stank of rotten eggs. Infamously, Lake Erie was declared dead in the newspapers and in Congressional testimony.

The stage was set for the formation of the Federal Environmental Protection Agency, the passage of the Clean Water Act, binational agreements through the International Joint Commission, and the growth of state environmental agencies. Huge efforts based on sound science led to enactment of policies to clean the lake — including targeting for removal as much as two-thirds of the phosphorous entering the lake. Phosphorus was removed from soaps and detergents. Pollution from raw sewage was reduced by stringent sewage-water treatment requirements. And the installation of phosphorous-scrubbing equipment was required in industrial smokestacks.

Lake Erie improved remarkably. Bottom-water oxygen levels increased, and water clarity improved. Fish kills decreased and sport fishing recovered. And, most evident, the large blooms of cyanobacteria had become a thing of past nightmares by the 1990s.

“Beaches were soiled with rotting cyanobacterial mats. The water stank of rotten eggs. Infamously, Lake Erie was declared dead in the newspapers and in Congressional testimony.”

Alas, the good news would not last. Although the Clean Water Act strictly regulated point-source pollution, mandating sewage treatment standards, it did not similarly restrict more diffuse sources, such as nutrients delivered by agricultural and suburban runoff. By the mid-1990s, measurements showed that streamflow into Lake Erie was increasing, and that it contained higher phosphorus levels than before that continued to climb. The result was a dramatic increase in the nutrient load delivered to Lake Erie.

The lake’s nutrient levels pushed back up to values not seen since the 1970s. Large cyanobacterial blooms have returned. Matters are even more urgent than before, because scientists have discovered that some cyanobacteria (Microcystis and Planktothrix, which dominate in the Western Basin and Sandusky Bay) produce liver toxins that the World Health Organization considers dangerous even in minute concentrations.

Alongside all the familiar environmental concerns, cyanobacterial blooms are now known to be potentially poisonous.

The oceans are so vast that they can look infinite to many people. It is then tempting to presume that future dead zone development could not possibly reach a global extent — that it would be restricted to more limited areas of high sensitivity. But would such a hunch be realistic? How confident could we be? Humanity is pumping an enormous amount of artificial and human and animal waste derived nutrients into the oceans, and global warming is taking place 10 to 100 times faster than in recent geological history.

The Science study reveals that the problem has taken hold in the world’s oceans already. Clearly, their vastness is no safeguard — which raises potent questions for the far-smaller, and more fragile inland lakes.

Detailed studies have now established that phosphorus levels would need to be decreased by about 40 percent to restore Lake Erie to mid-1990s conditions. Only a wholesale change in our attitudes toward the environment can bring relief, including committed conservation, re-establishment of natural filtration systems (wetlands and swamps), and relentless efforts to reduce runoff nutrient levels.

This cannot happen without an updated Clean Water Act.

Eelco J. Rohling is professor of ocean and climate change at the Australian National University in Canberra, and at the University of Southampton in England. He is a fellow of the American Geophysical Union, editor of the journal Reviews of Geophysics, and author of the book The Oceans: a Deep History (Princeton University Press, 2017).

Joseph D. Ortiz is a professor and the assistant chair in the department of geology at Kent State University. He is a fellow of the Geological Society of America.

Top visual: Nicholas A. Tonelli/Flickr
See What Others Are Saying

19 comments / Join the Discussion

    Just look at all the animal waste flowing into that watershed from giant CAFOs- factory farms. Take a look at the “Follow the Manure Report” where it has been found that the 630 million gallons of urine and fecal waste from 146 factory farms is flushed into the Western Lake Erie Watershed every year. These business are also funded by 16.8 million in federal subsidies. It breaks our hearts to see beautiful great lakes being used as toilets by under regulated Big AG.


    Let business poison where you drink and eat from. It is on you. No different than washing your food in your toilet.


    You start the piece acknowledging that a dramatic crash in ocean oxygen levels occurred long before modern humans. In other words, it’s happened before (likely many, many times) and we may move heaven and earth to thwart the human-bred version only to have earth do it again anyway. Not to say it’s not worth trying, but, you know, it may be for naught anyway.


    Only the eastern half of the Mediterranean. which lasted 4000 years, not all the oceans. All the oceans is what we are doing now, but 4000 years to recover is nothing, go human progress!


    This article raises questions that we need to be asking candidates for elected office this year, and presidential candidates in 2020. “Committed conservation, re-establishment of natural filtration systems (wetlands and swamps), and relentless efforts to reduce runoff nutrient levels” are the opposite of the direction of the current administration. Only electing candidates who care about and understand water issues can change that. Furthermore, controls on agricultural runoff must be brought under the Clean Water Act, and we need fearless elected officials to get there.


    Unfortunately Katie. The current administration, and GOP in general, considers all those things “pesky job killing regulations”. Trump is eviscerating the EPA and coal companies are now able to dump coal dust directly into streams.


    So, Eric and Joe, good article. Thanks for that.

    How, though, are there only 4 comments here and at least two of them are conspiracy theory nuts/trolls. I’m betting they don’t read the articles, they just hsitpost in any comment section they can find. You can’t read articles like this for too long and still post crap (and maybe actually believe?) crap like chemtrails. I wish you luck in your quest to set ’em right, Jesus Jones. But I won’t be betting on you. It’s tough to beat motivated reasoning in a comments section.

    This comment section is like a freezer-burnt ice cream sandwich after a 5 star meal. Maybe these comments are curated… Aww, dammit. Now I’m infected with the conspiracy germs…


    Tim the Enchantah,
    you must be part of the ignorant human being destroying the earth. I am a Bioligist. Chem trails are real they’ve been doing them since the 70s maybe earlier, to induce rain fall during california droughts. Global warming is REAL we are in big trouble and becaise individuals wont accept that it is a man made issue it will continue to become a problem. THE PROOF IS IN THE PUDDING AND THE PUDDING HAS BEEN SMEARED ON THE WALL. Please change your ignorance before its too late.

    We are in serious serious trouble and its being ignored and thats troubling!!



    See, it’s that type of stuff that just kills reality. Yes, global warming is real. But when you start taking “chem trails”, you lose me – and most others. Stick with big picture stuff and keep weird conspiracy paranoid stuff quiet.


    The Tipping Point was tipped over way back in the forty’s when they developed nuclear power with its toxic deadly waste with its life expectancy of thousands of years. Everything is dying and it is non reversible.


    Mark, there’s no such thing as chemtrails. It’s just a made up idea. There’s no secret bio-chemical engineering going on around the planet, there’s no metallic particles falling on mountain grass from airplanes. Remember acid rain? That was a real thing. We could test for it. People burning coal with high sulfur were in denial about it for a long time, but it was a real physical thing that we could test for, and figure out where the ‘acid rain’ was coming from.

    That’s what is different with chem trails – there’s nothing happening there, it’s just contrails. If it was happening, we’d be able to test and find out what is happening.


    There are chem – trails and much worse . Everything produced by man and corporation is sructured to destroy the planet . Open your eyes if you think everything is fine and dandy as it seems and none of these ” conspiracies ” exsist . Wake up !!


    If you believe you must have some support to provide. Please cite peer reviewed science not you tube videos or faux news.


    How about bioengineering.
    Look up there are chemical trails being sprayed everyday over the globe. And no uprising. We need to collectively say stop enough is enough. Why does everyone care about global warming and not what’s happening in your skies, believe you me this is part of the warming, part of the fires in country, as these metallic particles lay atop dry mountain grass, the sun came being magnified causing more chances of fires. Not to mention the habitats eating and breathing this in. Everyone is sick all over out country, it is not a coincidence we are all sick. It’s out environment. Its what’s being sprayed above you everyday. Just watch the lines. Please.


    First rule of a criticizing comment: Remember to proof read or you’ll just come off even more stupid.

Join the discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


& Tipsters

Corruption in science?
Academic discrimination?
Research censorship?
Government cover-ups?

Undark wants to hear about it.

Email us at tips@undark.org, or visit our contact page for more secure options.