It will never be possible to fully “protect” the ignorant from those who would victimize them.
All thanks to Dr Ibrahim for helping me with his herbs to cure my HIV virus right now i am now HIV negative doctor you are the best i ever meet he is real and can be trusted and also he is the best herbal doctor in India you all have to be careful of Africa doctors who claim they can help you with cure they are all fake.
While I agree with the above responders the instigator should be liable for the injury they cause if proven in court. No one should be able to act with impunity because they have a pulpit.
As responsible as the government of the town allowing the scene depicted atop this essay.
HIV has never been isolated in the lab. The test tests for a so called immune response as opposed to the existence of the ‘virus’ itself. The inventor of the test even acknowledges its flaws. The ‘screening’ is based on a lifestyle and habits Q&A session that varies wildly from country to country and people have gotten positive results in one country but negative results in another or retested 6 months later in the same country and come back negative as well. All typically after lifestyle changes (sleep & nutrition, stress reduction etc)
To the sheep among us the above revelations result in a blank stare. To the critical thinkers a process of research and discovery begins.
To be denied the information we wish to consume and essentially force fed a diet of curated and nutritionless information from one source (the censor) is akin to being given only GMO foods that are poisoned with cancer causing glyphosate (as per the WHO’s findings ) and told to trust our censors that the food/information is perfectly safe.
No thanks. I’ll source my own info and buy what I can’t grow from producers I have personally vetted.
/* Medicinal marijuana is likely a similar contentious issue, Given the lack of reliable research */
So do you think this video is faked https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fR-egkkY6d0 ? The lack of research is maintained by Big Pharma Lobby which fears of cheap competition.
/* where they become critical thinkers, i.e., skeptics */
Except that critical thinker shouldn’t become an ignorant skeptic, who denies new facts blindly. Critical thinker should be without bias both toward acceptation, both dismissal.
The answer, as always is MORE free speech, not less. You counter bad ideas with good ideas. Because the simple fact is that there is no one, anywhere, ever, who can be trusted to be the censor. Humans are imperfect and biased. No human, or group of humans, or algorithm programmed by humans, can be blindly trusted to distill truth and fact.
It is as “TruSkeptik” said above, people must be critical thinkers. It is the only option. Those who will not think critically will always be sheep, easily deceived and misled and ultimately killed by the lies they refuse to think critically about. And because humans are imperfect, there will always be some who mislead, and always some who follow them, and always some who die for it. That is not correctable, and never will be. It is simply part of the human condition.
How can any company with an acknowledged political bias be expected to determine the veracity of articles from charlatans? There are enough articles reproduced in allegedly respected scientific journals which are later proven to be erroneous or patently false. It is preposterous to imagine that the social media would be cabals if, or even interested in, separating the wheat from the chaff
No, youtube is not responsible. Youtube facilitates conversations and communication among a variety of different communities. It is not youtube’s responsibility to police the content of its users submissions. The only exception to this is that youtube is a privately held company and can set whatever rules or guidelines for its users it sees fit. Even charlatans have the right to free speech. The responsibility to determine if the information being presented is factual or beneficial lies with the consumer.
What a wonderful idea. Have the quacks police the quacks. The ONLY thing that will ever work is to educate people to the point where they become critical thinkers, i.e., skeptics. Nothing else will have any effect whatsoever on our perverse and diseased society.
The answer to this article is simple. Who decides what is “quackery”? Youtube and Facebook are qualified to make that assessment? The question is absurd. Perhaps a government agency of completely unbiased bureaucrats could decide!! Yeah, government is completely competent enough to do this! We should have them censoring individuals who lie too!!! What could possibly go wrong?
Medicinal marijuana is likely a similar contentious issue, Given the lack of reliable research
Comments are closed.